That’s a neat video…..Touching and all that….

However, after watching the whole thing and reflecting on some of our previous conversations the main thing that comes to mind for me is this:

You and I have discussed our differences in regards to model recruiting. You did your recruiting your way and you lived in small towns. Now you go around and talk about all the girls who come back to you a few weeks later and were devastated that their friends/family members found them nude online……

Now…I’ve been recruiting and shooting naked girls since 1991 and over the past 16 or so years, I think I have had 2 or maybe even 3 girls come back and ask me to help them get stuff taken down. I’ve shot 72 models over the last year. These models have been featured on sites that give them massive worldwide exposure, including a site that you owned in the past. Yet, not one of the last 72 models has come to me asking for anything more than additional modeling gigs.

Based on my experiences…and playing the Devil’s Advocate role….Would it not be safe to say that shooting for a porn producer, who lives in the same small town as you, and whose website is very well known throughout the community….Is not the smartest nor most normal way of being exposed to the industry?

You know BrettJ. He’s had similar issues over the years with his main site because the primary models featured are students who went to school at a major college whose campus he lived next door to. His site is also very well known by the community.

How can ANY model shoot for those types of sites and then not expect to be caught? As you stated in the video, you would disclose that risk but they would be starstruck images of you at the mansion and therefore blind to the reality of the situation they were about to become involved with. So….Had these girls been shot ONLY for your other clients and not for your prior site….They would have had a FAR less chance of being discovered by those they wanted to hide their secret from.

I know you well enough to know that you will try to blow holes in my theory and I fully expect you to do so…..The one thing I will give you is that I feel you are a better debater than I am. However, being able to debate an issue better than the other party does not automatically mean that you are right about the topic….It simply means that you know how to appeal to the sheep better than the other shepherd.

I love you, Brother.

Now why would I debate you? There’s a lot of truth to what you said.

That being said, simply because FEWER models are hurt…

So you want to focus on the word “fewer” which implies that at least one is still hurt?

Fine…….

Fewer people are killed each year by being in porn than by being in cars. In fact…I feel fairly confident that with the exception of supposed “snuff films”…Not one single person has ever died from being in a porn movie.

What? HIV? Please. People have a better chance of contracting HIV in their normal lives than they do from contracting it as a porn star. Just thought I would diffuse that one before it was brought up.

hey donny, looks like it went well…

Wow! Svelte!
Great job, Donny.
See ya next week.
Bill